Catalog Description
- Transfer Status
- CSU/UC
- Unit(s)
- 3.00
- Lecture: 51.00 Contact hours/102.00 Out of class hours/153.00 Total hours/3.00 Unit(s)
- Total: 51.00 Contact hours/102.00 Out of class hours/153.00 Total hours/3.00 Unit(s)
Course Description: A study of traditional logic with both deductive and inductive reasoning, including syllogisms, natural deduction, and fallacies. Practical application of basic skills in orderly and accurate reasoning and communication. (C-ID PHIL 110).
Objectives
Upon successful completion of this course, the student should be able to:
- Evaluate, analyze and criticize arguments.
- Organize beliefs and ideas in an orderly manner.
- Distinguish and evaluate deductive and inductive arguments.
- Identify and label various informal fallacies.
Course Content
Topic Titles / Suggested Time Topic
Lecture
| Topics | Lec Hrs |
|---|---|
Introduction | 8.00 |
Informal Fallacies | 10.00 |
Categorical Propositions and Square of Opposition | 6.00 |
Categorical Syllogisms | 12.00 |
Propositional logic | 9.00 |
Induction | 6.00 |
| Total Hours: | 51.00 |
Methods of Instruction
- Discussion
- Homework: Students are required to complete two hours of outside-of-class homework for each hour of lecture
- Lecture
- Multimedia Presentations
- Reading Assignments
Methods of Evaluation
- Exams/Tests
- Quizzes
- Portfolios
- Papers
- Class participation
- Mid-term and final examinations
- Students will write at least 1,500 words. This requirement will be met either by essay examinations, take-home tests, short papers, or book reports. (Note: all written work will be evaluated on both its form and content.)
Examples of Assignments
Reading Assignments
- Read the chapter in Copi/Cohen “Basic Logical Concepts”: Be prepared to discuss and/or write a short essay explaining the logical distinction between Valid and True.
- Read the Chapter in Copi/Cohen “Science and Hypotheses”: Be prepared to discuss and/or write a short essay explaining why many historians and philosophers of science argue that there are no “crucial experiments.”
Writing Assignments
- Go to a newspaper or internet site. Find an argument (NOT merely a report on a controversial issue). Then in a short 500-word essay analyze it for any of the informal fallacies presented in the course. Be sure to explain (not merely name) the fallacies.
- In a 750-word essay, construct an argument for or against a position on some controversial topic. Be sure not to commit any of the informal fallacies we discussed in class.
Out-of-Class Assignments
- Write out and evaluate an argument presented on an opinion program on television or streaming service.
- Ask an artificial intelligence chatbot to provide an example of a valid deductive argument, and then evaluate the answer.
Recommended Materials of Instruction
Hurley, P. J. (2024). A Concise Introduction to Logic. Cengage, 14th. 9780357798683.
Copi, I. & Cohen, C. (2019). Introduction to Logic. Routledge, 15th. 9781138500860.
Howard-Snyder, F., Howard-Snyder, D., & Wasserman, R. (2019). The Power of Logic. McGraw-Hill, 6th. 9781259848070.
Other Learning Materials
OER: Fundamental Methods of Logic (https://www.oercommons.org/courses/fundamental-methods-of-logic)
Minimum Qualifications
Philosophy (Masters Required)